Verify anythingLegal documentsReceipts & invoicesFraud & deceptionIntegrationsHow it works
HOW IT WORKS

Evidence first.
Conclusion second.

We build a verification plan for each case instead of running the same generic detector on everything. Different evidence deserves different questions. The product is useful because it knows what can actually be checked, and where.

PIPELINE / FLOWING
Grey files enter. Blue claims are extracted. Green means a source agreed. Orange means two things can’t both be true. Nothing leaves without a reason attached.
THE PIPELINE

Four stages. No shortcuts.

Scroll. Each stage stacks on the last, the way evidence should.

01

Understand the task

What is the user asking to verify, and what would count as evidence? A receipt and a contract don’t get the same plan. Neither does a screenshot of either.

02

Parse the material

Entities, dates, amounts, claims, references, document properties and relationships. A story becomes a list. Lists can be checked.

03

Build a source plan

Select the relevant connected systems, public sources and internal checks. Each claim gets the witness that was actually there.

04

Return an evidence map

Confirmed facts, conflicts, suspicious signals, source quality and unresolved gaps. In that order. With links. Without adjectives.

CONFIDENCE IS NOT CERTAINTY

We stop at the evidence. Not at 100.

A trustworthy system says when the evidence is weak. The needle goes as far as the sources allow, and then it stops, on purpose.

0
CEILING REACHED · 3 SOURCES · 1 GAP100% IS MARKETING
87

What the sources allow

Three sources agreed, one question has no witness yet. That is the ceiling. We don’t round up.

13

What we refuse to invent

The missing 13 is a named gap with a suggested next step, not a confidence we made up to look decisive.

00

Adjectives in the report

“Likely”, “clearly”, “obviously” are not evidence. We use verdicts, sources and links.

Confidence is not certainty

A trustworthy system should say when evidence is weak. “Not verified” is often more useful than pretending something is true or false.

Three sources agreeconfirmed
Two sources disagreeconflict
One source, unusual patternreview
No source available yetunknown

Human review stays visible

High-stakes legal, financial, identity or fraud decisions keep their source links, rationale and a clear path for a human to look again. The machine narrows the question. A person answers it.

The machine narrows the question. A person answers it.

EMET ONE / PIPELINE MODULE

The machine narrows the question. A person answers it.

RUN IT
THROUGH
THE PIPE.

One intake, four stages, four possible words at the end. Start with whatever you were sent.

Run a case ↗